← All posts

The brain is strong enough — the missing killer agent app is a 'body'

Bottom line:

The brain (models) is already in surplus; what agents lack is not a brain — it's a body.

That sounds like a metaphor, but I think it's becoming an industry fact.

1. Even the makers of the "brain" are chasing hardware

One telling signal: the model companies themselves are moving toward hardware.

In one line: as model capability approaches a plateau, value migrates toward the compute carriers / terminals / hardware. Lightweight models like DeepSeek-V4-Flash exist precisely so that things can run at the edge.

2. The symptom: agents went from demo to production, but the "killer" one never arrived

  • G2's observation: agents have moved from pilot to production, but enterprises are now fighting cost and reliability: https://company.g2.com/
  • Meanwhile "the app" — the one ordinary people can't live without — is widely seen as not here yet:
  • Medium, "The 'Killer App' for AI Doesn't Exist (Yet)"
  • valueaddvc, "Multimodal AI: The Killer App Nobody Has Built Yet"
  • Some even ask, "Are we all building AI agents nobody actually needs?"

A flood of agent projects on one side; "nobody actually needs this" on the other. That gap is where the opportunity is.

3. Why? The brain is strong; what's missing is body + nerves

In software, what agents do — write code, retrieve, summarize, call APIs — is commoditizing fast. Anyone can do it, so it's a red ocean.

What's genuinely hard and scarce:

  • Reliably sensing the physical world: device state, sensors, field data;
  • Reliably acting on the physical world: switching, actuating, controlling;
  • Running under real constraints: offline, power loss, real-time, power budget, safety.

However strong the model is, it's still a brain in a vat. Without a body and nerves it can't change the world — and that's the root reason the "killer app" is late.

MCP is part of the nervous system: it standardizes how the brain plugs into tools. But most MCP today connects to software (databases, SaaS, search). Wiring agents to real hardware has barely begun.

4. My bet: the next killer agent grows on hardware / the edge

Three directions, all pointing at a "body":

  1. On-device: local, offline, low-latency, private (this is the "outlet" DeepSeek is looking for);
  1. Embodied / automation equipment: robots, lines, unmanned systems;
  1. Edge gateways / industrial: pull existing equipment into an agent so it can be driven conversationally.

The crux: who can do this? You must understand both models and systems/embedded. Pure-software people can't build a "body": they don't touch electrical, real-time, reboots after power loss, or that old PLC on the line.

5. What to do as an engineer

  • Don't build the 1001st MCP server (red ocean);
  • Build the layer that lets an agent operate real devices: GPIO, serial, Modbus, system services (systemd), board telemetry (Jetson/nvpmodel), edge inference;
  • Ship artifacts over opinions: one thing that runs on real hardware and others can reuse beats ten "reviews".

My own bet is here too: use MCP/agents to drive a real edge device — it's a moat, content, and something sellable at once.

One line

The brain is strong enough. The next decade belongs to the people who can give agents a body — and in China, those are precisely the systems/embedded engineers.


Agree? Where does your "body" live? Comment below, or reach out via About.

Found this useful?

I write about AI agents × embedded / edge AI. Subscribe, or tell me about your project.

Consulting / work →Subscribe (RSS)Support

Comments 0

No comments yet — be the first!

Log in Log in to comment