The brain is strong enough — the missing killer agent app is a 'body'
Bottom line:
The brain (models) is already in surplus; what agents lack is not a brain — it's a body.
That sounds like a metaphor, but I think it's becoming an industry fact.
1. Even the makers of the "brain" are chasing hardware
One telling signal: the model companies themselves are moving toward hardware.
- DeepSeek is reportedly developing its own AI chip (Reuters, 2026-07): https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-deepseek-developing-its-own-ai-chip-sources-say-2026-07-07/
- Nvidia is bolstering support for Chinese open models (CNBC, 2026-08-27): https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/27/nvidia-chinese-ai-models.html
- MeigSmart deployed DeepSeek Harness onto its MT200 AI BOX (edge box): https://www.meigsmart.com/
- The press is drilling into on-device / edge AI (e.g. TMTPost, "the battle for edge AI has begun"): https://www.tmtpost.com/
In one line: as model capability approaches a plateau, value migrates toward the compute carriers / terminals / hardware. Lightweight models like DeepSeek-V4-Flash exist precisely so that things can run at the edge.
2. The symptom: agents went from demo to production, but the "killer" one never arrived
- G2's observation: agents have moved from pilot to production, but enterprises are now fighting cost and reliability: https://company.g2.com/
- Meanwhile "the app" — the one ordinary people can't live without — is widely seen as not here yet:
- Medium, "The 'Killer App' for AI Doesn't Exist (Yet)"
- valueaddvc, "Multimodal AI: The Killer App Nobody Has Built Yet"
- Some even ask, "Are we all building AI agents nobody actually needs?"
A flood of agent projects on one side; "nobody actually needs this" on the other. That gap is where the opportunity is.
3. Why? The brain is strong; what's missing is body + nerves
In software, what agents do — write code, retrieve, summarize, call APIs — is commoditizing fast. Anyone can do it, so it's a red ocean.
What's genuinely hard and scarce:
- Reliably sensing the physical world: device state, sensors, field data;
- Reliably acting on the physical world: switching, actuating, controlling;
- Running under real constraints: offline, power loss, real-time, power budget, safety.
However strong the model is, it's still a brain in a vat. Without a body and nerves it can't change the world — and that's the root reason the "killer app" is late.
MCP is part of the nervous system: it standardizes how the brain plugs into tools. But most MCP today connects to software (databases, SaaS, search). Wiring agents to real hardware has barely begun.
4. My bet: the next killer agent grows on hardware / the edge
Three directions, all pointing at a "body":
- On-device: local, offline, low-latency, private (this is the "outlet" DeepSeek is looking for);
- Embodied / automation equipment: robots, lines, unmanned systems;
- Edge gateways / industrial: pull existing equipment into an agent so it can be driven conversationally.
The crux: who can do this? You must understand both models and systems/embedded. Pure-software people can't build a "body": they don't touch electrical, real-time, reboots after power loss, or that old PLC on the line.
5. What to do as an engineer
- Don't build the 1001st MCP server (red ocean);
- Build the layer that lets an agent operate real devices: GPIO, serial, Modbus, system services (systemd), board telemetry (Jetson/nvpmodel), edge inference;
- Ship artifacts over opinions: one thing that runs on real hardware and others can reuse beats ten "reviews".
My own bet is here too: use MCP/agents to drive a real edge device — it's a moat, content, and something sellable at once.
One line
The brain is strong enough. The next decade belongs to the people who can give agents a body — and in China, those are precisely the systems/embedded engineers.
Agree? Where does your "body" live? Comment below, or reach out via About.
Comments 0
No comments yet — be the first!
Log in Log in to comment